A. It depends on who you ask. Raw milk—milk that is not pasteurized or homogenized—is making its way into more cereal bowls, with 29 states now allowing the sale of raw milk under varying restrictions. Raw-milk proponents will pay upwards of $10 a gallon, because they believe it is safe and healthier. A swell of testimonials about raw milk’s ability to relieve asthma, autism and allergies is further fueling the demand, though much of this praise remains anecdotal with few studies to back up these claims. Enthusiasts claim raw milk dishes out more flavor, vitamins, minerals and beneficial proteins, enzymes and bacteria than milk that has been “degraded” during pasteurization.
But the Centers for Disease Control and the FDA beg to differ, stating that pasteurized milk has all the same nutrients as raw milk and that raw milk comes with an added formidable risk of pathogen outbreaks. According to the CDC, these outbreaks accounted for more than 1,000 illnesses, more than 100 hospitalizations and two deaths between 1998 and 2005.
Catherine W. Donnelly, Ph.D., a food microbiologist at the University of Vermont, believes that the dangers cancel out any potential nutritional benefits. “Of particular concern is Listeria [a bacterium that results in a foodborne illness, listeriosis], which has a 30 percent mortality rate,” Donnelly warns. “If raw milk is your choice, it’s buyer beware.” When USDA scientists collected raw milk samples from 861 farms in 21 states, nearly a quarter of them contained bacteria linked to human illness, including 5 percent that tested positive for Listeria.
In short, it’s still too early to tell if raw milk lives up to its purported benefits, but the risks are real. We don’t recommend drinking raw milk or eating a raw-milk cheese that’s been aged less than the minimum of 60 days required for legal sale. (However, that caveat doesn’t apply to raw-milk cheeses aged 60 days or more, since the salt and acidity of the cheesemaking process make for a hostile environment to pathogens, says Donnelly.)
Deciding whether to take the risks associated with drinking raw milk is only one of the health-related choices you need to make when it comes to choosing the best milk for your family. When making a decision about which milk to buy, here are two other issues you may want to consider:
Fat content. Nutrition experts recommend drinking low-fat (a.k.a. 1%) or nonfat milk to limit intake of the saturated fats that boost risk of heart disease. Don’t be fooled: reduced-fat, or 2%, milk is not a low-fat food. One cup has 5 grams fat, 3 of them the saturated kind. Drink whole milk, which contains 5 grams of saturated fat per cup, only once in a while, if at all. The one exception to this rule is infants. Children under age 2 need extra fat in their diets to support their developing brains. Whole milk can help provide that fat.
Lactose. Up to 50 million Americans lack the enzyme lactase, which is needed to digest lactose, the sugar naturally found in milk. For these people, drinking most milks can cause digestive problems. Solution: Choosing lactose-free milk. This product is basically regular cow’s milk minus lactose. It provides all of the same healthful nutrients (e.g., protein and calcium), just not the sugar that stokes the digestive issues.
Raw milk is the best ever it helps greatly with bodybuilding also
10/12/2016 - 4:31pm
I also vote for raw milk because now a days the pasteurised milk is not good for health and the paturised milk doesn't contain any vitamins, minerals and calcium to the bones. So I choose raw milk is better than pasteurised milk
10/12/2016 - 1:48am
I vote raw! Recently I've been learning about nutrien and finding out what good and what's bad and in short raw milk is very very good while pasteurised is blah! and pointless actually.
08/04/2016 - 8:15pm
I love your homemade cracker jack recipe! I also love your weekend debrief on sports related things.
06/22/2016 - 1:37am
As a nutritionist, I believe raw milk, from clean, range free animals is the better way to get all the nutritional benefits that milk has to offer.
And as for the CDC, I'll just say that they are not the smartest people on the planet, after all they are the government, and what would you expect...
05/16/2016 - 8:31am
I grew up on a farm and we had milk cows. That we never had any illness that I can remember from drinking the milk, I do know that to ensure the safety of it, good hygiene is of paramount importance. Frankly, I would never drink raw milk as it would upset my stomach after not drinking it for years. Plus, much of the "cures asthma, autism, and black eyes" hasn't been proven and until it is, it is all hearsay IMO.
04/20/2016 - 7:02pm
raw milk could be the reason we dont see austism in the amish communities
03/27/2016 - 5:10pm
People don't realize the reason raw milk can have these bacterium is because of unclean farming practices, usually from large commercial companies. Pasteurization just gives these companies a way to AVOID having to treat the animals well and keep them healthy. If you have a health animal and you collect the milk in a clean and hygienic fashion as well as seal and properly cool it, then it will not have these harmful bacteria. Most small farms are good because they take good care of their animals.
03/26/2016 - 3:57pm
lol....2 deaths in 7 years.I bet more people died of falling out of bed,good thing cdc is keeping us safe from fresh milk
03/19/2016 - 7:23am
I think the fact that you are recommending "1%" or "2%" milk goes to show you have no idea what you are talking about. Whole milk is high in fat - so what? Fat does not make you fat. Fat satisfies you and, in the long run, you eat LESS. Adult human bodies and brains NEED fat, protein and some carbs (they do not need "sugar"). Modern, low-fat diets = obesity. Traditional, high-fat diets = health.